Grand Junction Metropolis Council mentioned the suggestions throughout its Monday Planning Fee working session on learn how to regulate marijuana companies within the metropolis.
Voters will determine whether or not they’ll permit marijuana companies to function within the metropolis throughout the April election.
Nonetheless, Metropolis Supervisor Greg Caton mentioned town was attempting to supply voters with a possible framework on how these companies can be regulated if allowed.
“I am positive the board can recognize that we create a framework or define of what members of our neighborhood would possibly anticipate the place we could be heading if that is permitted by the voters, however what number of particulars can we do earlier than the voters see it, mentioned Cato. “So that is the stability we’re looking for.”
Senior Planner Lance Gloss introduced the suggestions to Metropolis Council. He mentioned metropolis employees, together with the planning fee and a working group with stakeholder representatives and neighborhood members, have been engaged on this situation since final summer season.
“We have been protecting this subject since mid-summer of final yr and we have had a number of workshops, public hearings, and planning committee workshops in addition to extra just lately on this subject,” Gloss mentioned. “We additionally had a comparatively massive employees staff, unfold throughout all departments, delving into varied dimensions of this slightly difficult topic.”
The advice to control retail shops largely follows present liquor retailer rules, together with a 500-foot buffer zone for faculties.
Manufacturing of the merchandise can be restricted to particular business and industrial areas, whereas cultivation was advisable just for industrial areas.
Council member Kraig Andrews requested why the planning fee advisable a 500-foot buffer for faculties when the duty drive had beforehand advisable 1,000 toes.
Planning Fee Chairman Andrew Teske mentioned he believes a aggressive evaluate course of for retail retailer functions and limiting the variety of shops is one of the simplest ways to control location enterprises.
Nonetheless, if the Request for Proposals (RFP) course of didn’t embrace a localization ingredient, the fee’s suggestion might change.
“If it turned out that the RFP course of didn’t embrace a localization element or had different options that required a special strategy to buffering, the fee, I believe, would suggest. that we’re choices for one thing extra significant by way of distance and perhaps within the kinds of makes use of which might be buffered, ”Teske mentioned.
This RFP course of might start as early as August with the approval of functions by January 2022, in response to the timeline proposed by town, though a brand new metropolis council, which may also be elected in April, might. change that.
There was some denial from the Board on Enterprise Licenses to be permitted.
Rising marijuana particularly within the metropolis was opposed by council member Rick Taggart, who mentioned he did not assume it was an acceptable use.
“I’m completely in opposition to cultivation on this neighborhood,” Taggart mentioned. “I respect the truth that it’s important to put it in I1 and I2, however I am unable to think about what corporations are going to assume that run huge mild manufacturing industries with a marijuana subject proper subsequent to it.
A number of board members thanked Gloss and the planning committee for his or her work.
Council member Phillip Pe’a mentioned whereas different communities have been regulating marijuana companies for a while, it will likely be troublesome to search out the correct resolution for Grand Junction.
“It seems like it might be straightforward as a result of the wheel is already invented, however now it is tougher as a result of now it’s important to discover the one that can work finest for us,” mentioned Pe’a.
Because the assembly was a working session, no motion was taken by town council.